

Can you tell the difference between the two pictures above? In the first pic Gamespot rated GTA 4 a 9.5 and in the second pic the score has mysteriously been bumped to a full 10. The obvious question is why did this happen?
I know most gamers don't give a shit about ethics and the videogame press, but if you can't appreciate what's going on here then something is seriously wrong with you. Now I can't officially say what caused this change, but given Gamespot's record of pandering to videogame publishers and firing their own employees for not giving high enough scores what do you think is going on here? It's insane!
Now I love the GTA franchise. I'd go as far as saying that it's my favorite franchise ever. However, the hype and bullshit reviews surrounding this game are making me sick. Not that reviews for a huge game like this really matter, but to put it bluntly many of the reviews for this game are bought and paid for in some way and are far from honest. I've always said that major AAA games never get bad scores and this game is the perfect example of why that is.
Very sad. I am a member of GameSpot, and it is a shame that the website has
acquired a lot notoriety on the internet. Hopefully they will be able to
redeem themselves.
"I've always said that major AAA games never get bad scores and this game
is the perfect example of why that is."
Gamespot always gives other games crap about not being original or fresh,
and this is tyipicaly worse with sequels. Now i havent played gta4, but
what the hell would make it so damn revoulutionary and different to
desserve a gamespot 10? If someone can prove me wrong and tell me a good
reason how it differentients itself from the other gta games, then please
tell me. Otherwise this is just another cheap sellout like skrubking said.
this is an official post froma gamespot rep on the ps3 forums as to their
reasonf or changing the scrore..
Kane and Lynch is not a well known AAA franchise. I'm talking about big,
popular games like GTA, Halo, Super Mario.
"We never posted a review with the score of 9.5. What you saw was a bug
that sometimes causes scores to appear on the site before reviews go live.
Sometimes that score is correct, sometimes it isn't. In this case, it
wasn't."
Those are bull shit excuses, a glitch that displays wrong numbers? Then it
would be somthing like 12846859, not a solid 9.5.
Gamespot has lost all credibility. This is just another example of *why*
"major AAA games never get bad scores" Zelda TP 8.8 Nuff said.
Aparently TP wasnt revoulutionary enough to resieve a 10, or even a 9,
which is back to my point, what the hell is so damn different in gta4 from
other gta games to make it a 10? Whats so revolutionary? Dont ssay the
multiplayer, cuz thats not enough. Im sure gta4 is a great game, but a 10?
Come on.
Hear hear, my friend! The game doesn't look atrocious by any stretch of
the imagination, but it's nothing we haven't seen before. And besides,
it's been done far better in the form of Oblivion. Reviews are acting like
this is the first free-roaming world game of all time, much less the first
great one. Gamespot has lost all credibility, it's true. So have a LOT of
gaming sites now, all of which were pandering enough to give GTAIV
ridiculously good reviews.
First, this score change is ridiculous, GS should be ashamed. Second it's
not worth ten. It is fantastic, the best GTA yet, and utterly engrossing,
but no, as you say Voltaire, it is not that revolutionary. 10 would imply
perfection, and I've found several flaws in the 20 odd hours I've already
spent with it. That said, I'm not bad mouthing it, it is excellent, and 100
times more deserving of the hype than Assassin's Creed. But I'm a firm
believer that perfect scores should never really be given out. Especially
as a bump. It just discourages further creativity.